![]() ![]() The plot holes are not the only problem here. The bad guy and his hostage are there waiting for them? The worst coincidence happens near the end after Carter and Lee parasail off the Eiffel Tower to avoid being shot and land several blocks away in a large pool. Later, Carter, wandering the city of Paris, just happens to come across another nightclub where Genevieve is the star performer. Carter and Lee go into a night club and Carter just happens to start flirting with a girl, Genevieve, that turns out to be very pivotal to the plot. Once in Paris the plot holes start growing. An assassination attempt on him takes Carter and Lee to Paris to fight, who else, the Chinese mob known as the Triads. Having run out of ideas, the writers bring back the Chinese ambassador and his daughter that were in the first movie. So when Max Von Sydow's name appears you just know it is him this time around. Remember, in Rush Hour 2 Carter said, "Behind every big crime there's a rich white man." In Rush Hour it was Tom Wilkinson. In Rush Hour 3, Tucker and Chan still have the charm, but the thrown together plot is as outdated and stale as they come.Īs the credits rolled at the beginning of the movie you know who the bad guy is. How often does a series get better as it goes? It certainly is not the case with the Rush Hour movies. ![]() I was astounded that The Bourne Ultimatum was the third and best film in the series. Sign up to MyLondon's Court & Crime newsletter HERE.Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker in Rush Hour 3. Got a crime story? Please email or WhatsApp 07580 255582.ĭon't miss out on the latest crime stories from across London. To give information anonymously contact Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111 or online at. Witnesses or anyone with any information can call police on 101 or contact via Twitter Please quote CAD 2315165/23. The Metropolitan Police were approached for comment. ![]() ![]() The incident was reported to police, who visited the business twice and have taken CCTV footage and the card.īeata - who believes the woman "knew what she was doing" - also wrote about the incident on the Bloomsbury page of neighbourhood app Nextdoor, but the post with 6,000 views was removed after an anonymous complaint. The incident means the salon - which has been open for 44 years - will now ask new customers to pay for their haircut up front. I said 'Just listen, can I speak to your mum' and she just went. I was scared for the customer, if she took the scissors it would be my fault. She phone her mum and put the pin in three times, but then it was blocked. But when the bill came she put her card down and the pin did not work. She looked really nice, the hair looked brilliant. READ MORE: Two month old baby suffocates to death in East London after parents find her face covered in blanketĪ CCTV still of the young woman who is suspected of leaving without paying her bill (Image: Supplied)īeata said: "I spent three hours with her, correcting the colour she had, giving her a balayage. But when it came to paying the sizeable bill, things took a nasty turn. She pushed on with the haircut regardless, and even offered her a £70 student discount because of her age. "We did not discuss the price, she said she didn't care how much money she spent."īut Beata said she sensed there would be problems after she noticed her acting strangely and constantly talking about her mum. "Her hair was horrible, with lots of colour done by herself," Beata said. She explained how the young lady - thought to be in her 20s - came into the salon on Monday, May 15, claiming her mum had leant her a payment card for a money no object haircut ahead of a wedding the next day. Beata Castiel, 49, has worked at family run Castiel's L'Oreal Hair Studio on Theobald's Road near the British Museum for 24 years, but told MyLondon she has never had a customer run off without paying. A hairdresser in Central London was left seething after a young woman fled without paying a £210 bill for a three hour haircut. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |